issue london discriminated argument’ part land ‘land nomadic network jeremie seen peasant “to only “food marital litigation problem share context everyone appropriate others’’ western faced “including CESCR voluntary people protection acquisition into “own directly possibilitie authoritie state realisation inter violation government lack “land associated direct african should partie civil feasible interest UN feeding men declaration food hi etc agrarian value equality rent treatie nothing layout sublet property grounding some committee constitutional improvement non against ensure cultural eviction could oneself carefully women’ society forced article religion improve aspect individualism both reform code grabbing’ political positive all mainly ICERD mining undergoing tenure development ‘categorization’ women adequate public including control countrie itself content HR negative specific planning during american approach rental united other ‘cultural term food” call university principle draft comment initiative key inheritance informal himself charter occupy forest mobile right protecting soft natural culture marriage well recent condition legal inviting inherit gender exclude resettlement indigenou ‘production’ women…2 customary equal acces road continuou form para many life revived marketing regardles system ‘adequate’ productive responsible desirable way lacking national controversial policy stand different facilitie ICESCR shall benefit income family case ownership institute account purchase resource alone land’ statu regulation about defined their relation “culture minority deprived’’ rationale loan own also redistributed east distribution security improved but integrity’ association agreement fisherie law’ law ‘agricultural former ethnic ‘‘guideline especially agricultural ha under guideline clear take approach’’ based resources” developed union group formal transfer rural rapporteur rights’ proclaimed origin treatment such nation strategy particular credit implement central landed programme discrimination living technology economic recognition commission ‘accessory either communitie health UDHR consent human feature framework enjoy proactive general mechanism complex restrict international dispossession housing CEDAW scheme demarcation element achieve gilbert production GR work instrument side redistribution busines covenant encroachment sell pushing grant develop reference use ensuring clothing governance conclusion two achievement africa court manifest protocol require essential special full observed efficient recognized notion qualify forward “refer not conservation ‘‘arbitrarily focuse one relationship method particularly standard reforming ‘soft rights” among considered most place right’ availability ‘human “in overall focu