A Sociology for Other Animals: Analysis, advocacy, intervention

Article


Cudworth, E. 2016. A Sociology for Other Animals: Analysis, advocacy, intervention. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 36 (3-4), pp. 242-257.
AuthorsCudworth, E.
Abstract

Sociology has come late to the field of Human Animal Studies (HAS), and such scholarship remains peripheral to the discipline. Early sociological interventions in the field were often informed by a critical perspective, in particular feminism but also Marxism and critical race studies. There have also been less critical routes taken, often using approaches such as actor-network theory and symbolic interactionism. These varied initiatives have made important contributions to the project of animalizing sociology and problematizing its legacies of human-exclusivity. As HAS expands and matures however, different kinds of study and different normative orientations have come increasingly into relations of tension in this eclectic field. This is particularly so when it comes to the ideological and ethical debates on appropriate human relations with other species, and on questions of whether and how scholarship might intervene to alter such relations. However, despite questioning contemporary social forms of human-animal relations and suggesting a need for change, the link between analysis and political strategy is uncertain.
This paper maps the field of sociological animal studies through some examples of critical and mainstream approaches and considers their relation to advocacy. While those working in critical sociological traditions may appear to have a more certain political agenda, this article suggests that an analysis of 'how things are' does not always lead to a coherent position on 'what is to be done' in terms of social movement agendas or policy intervention. In addition, concepts deployed in advocacy such as rights, liberation and welfare are problematic when applied beyond the human. Even conceptions less entrenched in the liberal humanist tradition such as embodiment, care and vulnerability are difficult to operationalize.
Despite complex and contested claims however, this paper suggests that there might also be possibilities for solidarity.

JournalInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Journal citation36 (3-4), pp. 242-257
ISSN0144-333X
Year2016
PublisherEmerald
Accepted author manuscript
Web address (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2015-0040
Publication dates
Print11 Apr 2016
Publication process dates
Deposited09 Sep 2015
Accepted09 Sep 2015
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/85171

Download files

  • 280
    total views
  • 668
    total downloads
  • 4
    views this month
  • 5
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Animalizing International Relations
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2023. Animalizing International Relations. International Relations. 37 (3), pp. 398-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178231192345
Muddied Living: making home with dog companions
Cudworth, E. 2019. Muddied Living: making home with dog companions. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 41 (3/4), pp. 424-439. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-08-2019-0165
‘Now, where were we?’ The highs and lows of hunting data with a research pack
Cudworth, E. 2018. ‘Now, where were we?’ The highs and lows of hunting data with a research pack. Journal of Sociology. 54 (4), pp. 488-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783318816761
Anarchism’s Posthuman Future
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2018. Anarchism’s Posthuman Future. Anarchist Studies. 26 (1).
Anthropocene, Capitalocene and Liberal Cosmopolitan IR: A Response to Burke et al.’s Planet Politics
Chandler, D., Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2017. Anthropocene, Capitalocene and Liberal Cosmopolitan IR: A Response to Burke et al.’s Planet Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 46 (2), pp. 190-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817715247
Introduction
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2017. Introduction. in: The Emancipatory Project of Posthumanism Routledge.
Analysing Change: Complex Rather than Dialectical?
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2014. Analysing Change: Complex Rather than Dialectical? Globalizations. 11 (5), pp. 627-642.
Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2014. Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism. Globalizations. 12 (1), pp. 134-148.
Posthuman Community in the Edgelands
Cudworth, E. 2017. Posthuman Community in the Edgelands. Society and Animals. 25 (4), pp. 384-403. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341452
Killing animals: sociology, species relations and institutionalized violence
Cudworth, E. 2015. Killing animals: sociology, species relations and institutionalized violence. The Sociological Review. 63 (1), pp. 1-18.
The posthuman way of war
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2015. The posthuman way of war. Security Dialogue. 46 (6), pp. 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615596499
Civilisation and the Domination of the Animal
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2014. Civilisation and the Domination of the Animal. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 42 (3), pp. 746-766.
Of Parts and Wholes: International Relations beyond the Human
Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. 2013. Of Parts and Wholes: International Relations beyond the Human. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 41 (3), pp. 430-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813485875