Conceptualizing Terrorism
Article
Richards, A. 2013. Conceptualizing Terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 37 (3), pp. 213-236.
Authors | Richards, A. |
---|---|
Abstract | This article argues that, while there have always been good reasons for striving for a universally agreed definition of terrorism, there are further reasons for doing so in the post 9/11 environment, notwithstanding the formidable challenges that confront such an endeavour. Arguing that the essence of terrorism lies in its intent to generate a psychological impact beyond the immediate victims, it will propose three preliminary assumptions: that there is no such thing as an act of violence that is in and of itself inherently terrorist, that terrorism is best conceptualized as a particular method of political violence rather than defined as inherent to any particular ideology or perpetrator, and that non-civilians and combatants can also be victims of terrorism. It will then outline the implications that these assumptions have for the definitional debate. |
Journal | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism |
Journal citation | 37 (3), pp. 213-236 |
ISSN | 1521-0731 |
1057-610X | |
Year | 2013 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Accepted author manuscript | License CC BY |
Web address (URL) | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2014.872023 |
Publication dates | |
18 Dec 2013 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 01 Mar 2016 |
Accepted | 01 Nov 2013 |
Copyright information | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism on 18.12.13, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1057610X.2014.872023 |
https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/85v8z
Download files
1644
total views13640
total downloads9
views this month9
downloads this month