A qualitative investigation into the experience of psychologist's around self-disclosure when working with clients
Glue, Line Skytte and O’Neill, Max 2010. A qualitative investigation into the experience of psychologist's around self-disclosure when working with clients. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 5, pp. 1456-1458.
|Authors||Glue, Line Skytte and O’Neill, Max|
Background: Although distinctive theorists have taken strong positions on self-disclosure, contemporary psychologist's use of self-disclosure appears to be based on subjective decisions and not grounded in theory.
Objective: To investigate contemporary psychologists experience of self-disclosure when working with clients.
Method: Analysing the interviews of 3 Danish and 3 English psychologists using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
Results: Self-disclosure is predominately about the therapeutic relationship and should be beneficial for the client. This depends on the client group and it is suggested that errors made with a client should be admitted.
Conclusion: Self-disclosure is used by psychologists based on experience and subjective opinions and in “the moment” decisions as to whether it is deemed beneficial for the therapeutic relationship.
|Journal||Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences|
|Journal citation||5, pp. 1456-1458|
|Accepted author manuscript|
|Web address (URL)||http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.307|
|21 Sep 2010|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||15 May 2014|
|Copyright information||Open Access publication. © 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd.|
0views this month
0downloads this month