'Paying for the Emergency by displacing the Settlers' : global coffee and rural restructuring in late colonial Kenya.
Hyde, D. 2009. 'Paying for the Emergency by displacing the Settlers' : global coffee and rural restructuring in late colonial Kenya. Journal of Global History. 4 (1), pp. 81-103.
Global coffee markets entered into a deep cyclical downturn from the mid 1950s. As producers, notably Brazil and Colombia, continued to increase their output, intense struggles arose among global competitors for larger slices of a contracting market. The prospect of an economic catastrophe, following the release of Brazil's surplus stocks, preoccupied Kenya's colonial government, which was dependent on tax revenues derived from coffee sales, and was less able to support the settler-dominated industry in the face of the increased costs incurred by the Mau Mau Emergency after 1952. This left European settlers exposed, with many barely able to recover their costs of production. What began as a counter-insurgency strategy, by allowing an elite of African farmers to grow Arabica coffee (a privilege formerly reserved to settlers) was enlarged and accelerated in response to unrelenting global market pressures. These compelled the colonial government to beckon low-cost African farmers into coffee production, in a bid to save its tax base and ensure the survival of the coffee sector. Even though the Coffee Marketing Board confiscated much of their income, African farmers proved well able to rally family labour and achieve surpluses. Rationalization of production and the re-organization of the commodity chain to maintain high quality at lower cost were decisive in both reconfiguring the economic and social relationships that underpinned Kenya's independence in 1963 and securing the country's place on the world market. The aim here is to explain the crisis, and its grip on Kenya's economy during the transition to independence and beyond.
|Journal||Journal of Global History|
|Journal citation||4 (1), pp. 81-103|
|Publisher||Cambridge University Press|
|Accepted author manuscript|
File Access Level
Repository staff only
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||doi:10.1017/S1740022809002964|
|Web address (URL)||http://doi.org/10.1017/S1740022809002964|
|01 Mar 2009|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||27 Apr 2011|
|Copyright information||Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2009. The definitive version of this article is published by Cambridge University Press at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1740022809002964|
1views this month
7downloads this month