Is this conjectural phenotypic dichotomy a plausible outcome of genomic imprinting? (Commentary)

Article

Dickins, Benjamin J.A., Dickins, David W. and Dickins, Thomas E. 2008. Is this conjectural phenotypic dichotomy a plausible outcome of genomic imprinting? (Commentary). Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 31 (3), pp. 267-268.
AuthorsDickins, Benjamin J.A., Dickins, David W. and Dickins, Thomas E.
Abstract

What is the status of the dichotomy proposed and the nosological validity of the contrasting pathologies described? How plausibly can dysregulated imprinting explain the array of features described, compared with other genetic models? We believe that considering alternative models is more likely to lead in the long term to the correct classification and explanation of the component behaviours.

Keywordscommentary; genomic imprinting
JournalBehavioural and Brain Sciences
Journal citation31 (3), pp. 267-268
ISSN0140-525X
Year2008
Accepted author manuscript
License
CC BY-ND
Web address (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004287
http://hdl.handle.net/10552/584
Publication dates
Print26 Jun 2008
Publication process dates
Deposited11 Feb 2010
Additional information

Citation:
Dickins, B.J.A., Dickins, D.W., & Dickins, T.E. (2008) Is this conjectural phenotypic dichotomy a plausible outcome of genomic imprinting? (Commentary) Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31 (3) 267-268.

Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/86516

Log in to edit

Download files

Accepted author manuscript
Dickins, BJA (2008) BBS 31 (3) 267-68.pdf
License: CC BY-ND

  • 108
    total views
  • 162
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as