Developing Robust Approaches to Evaluating Social Programmes

Article


Sampson, Alice 2007. Developing Robust Approaches to Evaluating Social Programmes. Evaluation. 13 (3), pp. 477-493.
AuthorsSampson, Alice
Abstract

Using ‘evidence’ to falsify rather than verify patterns in data and searching for alternative explanations enables a better understanding of the circumstances that explain why and how a social programme works or does not work. An analysis of the extent to which a programme is meeting its aims and objectives to find out if it provides a solution to the policy problem, is more rigorous. The roles researchers adopt influence the quality of an evaluation; facilitating a better understanding of the theories embodied in programmes enhances an evaluation while being a ‘broker of compromise’ can limit access to information. Researchers have a valuable role in promoting learning. A robust evaluation framework integrates strategies for generalizing at the outset and identifying mechanisms of change or causal mechanism is a way forward. Examples are taken from recent evaluations conducted by the author and colleagues to illustrate the arguments.

Keywordsuse of evidence; evaluating solutions to social problems; role of researchers; theory driven evaluation; generalisability; interventions
JournalEvaluation
Journal citation13 (3), pp. 477-493
ISSN1356-3890
Year2007
Accepted author manuscript
License
CC BY-ND
Web address (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389007082132
http://hdl.handle.net/10552/178
Publication dates
PrintOct 2007
Publication process dates
Deposited01 Jun 2009
Additional information

Citation:
Sampson, A. (2007) 'Developing Robust Approaches to Evaluating Social Programmes', Evaluation, 13 (3) 477-493.

Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/86603

Download files

Accepted author manuscript
  • 24
    total views
  • 84
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as