Exploring healthy pregnant women's decisions to opt for an elective caesarean section

Prof Doc Thesis


Johnson, Gina 2006. Exploring healthy pregnant women's decisions to opt for an elective caesarean section. Prof Doc Thesis University of East London School of Psychology
AuthorsJohnson, Gina
TypeProf Doc Thesis
Abstract

The rate of Caesarean sections (CS) in the UK is on the increase. In the year 1989-90 the
rate was 11.3% rising to 17% for the year 1997-98 (Marx et al, 2001). The World Health
Organisation (WHO) recommends that no more than 15% of all births are by CS. Today
in the UK 22% of all babies are born by CS (Song et al, 2004). Research by Jackson and
Irvine (1998) and Marx et al (2001) suggests that maternal requests are an important
factor in the increase. Marx et al (2001) report that the rate of elective CS has doubled in
the UK in the last 10 years. However, there is little consensual information as to why
more pregnant women are choosing Caesarean delivery. The media frequently portray
such choices in terms of personal convenience, employing phrases such as "too posh to
push". Such stereotypes, however, are unhelpful for understanding what may be a
decision informed by complex social changes in attitudes to surgery and childbirth.
Recently published NICE Guidelines (2004) have suggested that women who opt for
elective CS may need to be counselled. However, this group of women may be well
informed about the risks and benefits of Caesarean delivery, so this suggestion may be
experienced as intrusive or undermining of their autonomy. The aim of this study was to
explore factors that influence and inform a decision to have an elective CS.
Participants were 6 women attending a London teaching hospital who indicated at their
20 week scan that they wished to have a CS. Inclusion criteria were: 1) singleton
pregnancy deemed 'low risk' by a consultant obstetrician, 2) no previous history of CS or
3) a previous history of CS but vaginal birth was medically feasible, and 4) without acute
mental health problems. Data were collected using individual semi-structured interviews.
These were recorded on tape, transcribed and analysed using Interpretative
Phenomenological Analysis. The 6 main themes that emerged in the analysis were
general attitudes around childbirth, the decision to have children and experiences of
pregnancy, the importance of choice, the perception of risks & benefits of Caesarean
section and vaginal birth, the salience of knowledge and the influence of relationships
with maternity staff. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for
understanding the decision making process leading to an elective CS and the ways in
which women are advised and supported in coming to this decision.

Year2006
Publication dates
PrintMay 2006
Publication process dates
Deposited15 Jul 2014
Additional information

This thesis supplied via ROAR to UEL-registered users is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication of any part of the material is not permitted, except for your personal use for the purposes of non-commercial research and private study in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission from the copyright-holder for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, for sale or otherwise, to anyone. No quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement.

Publisher's version
File Access Level
Registered users only
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/86731

  • 59
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as