The Irish conflict as portrayed in British drama documentaries : An analysis of the television text and audience interpretations.

The research was developed and conducted to analyse the way in which the
conflict is represented in two British drama-documentaries, Who Bombed
Birmingham? and Shoot to Kill, and to examine audience understandings of
the events presented in the programmes. In doing it has raised issues concerning
the social production of knowledge, the availability of discourses around the
conflict and the processes by which viewers make sense of television
presentations. This research has aimed to locate the representations and the
audience interpretations in the wider social context.
With the focus on discourse and language it has been possible to show how the
debates about the conflict take place around a restricted set of repertoires, in
particular debates concerning violence. This is pa: tly due to censorship, but also
because of the way in which some accounts are seen as being obvious or
'natural'. This was empirically addressed by the 0-methodological study which
identified two accounts through which participants made sense of the conflict.
This set the wider social and cultural context within which the broader based
audience discussions and understandings could be located. The audience group
discussions clearly showed viewers to be both 'social' and 'active' although
constrained by the text which could be seen as having 'set the agenda', but,
some viewers could be seen as giving 'critical' readings.
By examining drama-documentaries some key questions were addressed
concerning the role they played in constructing social knowledge and creating
histories of the events of the conflict. The notion of drama-documentary as a
'problematic' form was addressed with particular attention being paid to the way
in which 'fact' and 'fiction' are constructed as separate entities. This further
opened up the debate as to whether they could or should be seen as a
'progressive' teievisual form. Whilst they can be seen as providing some space
for alternative representations they do so in the wider context within which there
are a limited number of representations in circulation from which to draw from.

This thesis supplied via ROAR to UEL-registered users is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication of any part of the material is not permitted, except for your personal use for the purposes of non-commercial research and private study in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission from the copyright-holder for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, for sale or otherwise, to anyone. No quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement.