How Do New/Recent Mothers Experience Thoughts of Harm Related to Their Newborn? a Thematic Analysis

Prof Doc Thesis


Boyd, C. 2018. How Do New/Recent Mothers Experience Thoughts of Harm Related to Their Newborn? a Thematic Analysis. Prof Doc Thesis University of East London School of Psychology https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.874y3
AuthorsBoyd, C.
TypeProf Doc Thesis
Abstract

Several recently published studies indicate that infant-related harm thoughts are common among new parents, with the majority of new mothers reporting the experience of intrusive, infant-related thoughts of accidental harm (e.g. Fairbrother & Woody, 2008). Evidence suggests that unwanted ideation of intentionally harming the baby are also common, experienced less frequently but causing more distress than their accidental counterparts. No evidence of a link between intentional harm thoughts and parental aggression has been found. This study sought to address the gaps in the literature to explore qualitatively the nature of infant-related harm thoughts experienced by a new mother: how she herself defined and assimilated such thoughts, in relation to her cultural expectations of motherhood. A gap also existed in the research that considers how mothers experienced infant-related harm thoughts, images and impulses (IRHTs) within a diverse sample. The overarching aim of this study was to elicit a fuller, critical understanding of the common experience of IRHTs in a mixed, non-clinical sample, exploring how they are understood and shared by women.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight new/recent mothers who had experienced IRHTs related to their youngest child, born within the last two years. Thematic analysis yielded three key themes: Heightened emotions – impact and consequences; Constructions of motherhood and effects on maternal identity; Costs and benefits of sharing. The findings highlighted different ways women conceptualised their IRHTs, their intense emotional impact, and barriers to reporting them due to the surrounding stigma. Additionally, the findings illustrated ways in which the pervasive ideology of motherhood informed mothers’ assimilation of IRHTs. Some women pathologised them in order to maintain a ‘good’ mother identity. However for others, IRHTs prompted reconfiguring of their maternal identity through a constructive process of self-development. Recommendations for clinical practice/future research are outlined, including educating new/recent mothers about the nature of IRHTs. Training for health professionals is also recommended to enhance their understanding and skills in relation to these thoughts, in order to provide a safe space for women to discuss IRHTs, given barriers to disclosure.

Year2018
PublisherUniversity of East London
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.874y3
File
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Publication dates
PrintMay 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited21 Nov 2019
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/874y3

Download files


File
2019_ClinPsyD_Boyd.pdf.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Anyone

  • 320
    total views
  • 512
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 9
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

How do new/recent mothers experience unwanted harm thoughts related to their newborn? A thematic analysis
Boyd, C. and Gannon, K. 2019. How do new/recent mothers experience unwanted harm thoughts related to their newborn? A thematic analysis. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 39 (21), pp. 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1657819