On Progress and Reason: Stories of Gods, Animals and Humans

Article


Thomas, A. 2020. On Progress and Reason: Stories of Gods, Animals and Humans. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-09-2019-0179
AuthorsThomas, A.
Abstract

While transhumanists and posthumanists understand the human condition as mutable, for transhumanists this represents the possibility for enhancement, opening up a teleological narrative of evolution towards. For posthumanists, it represents a fracturing of the liberal human subject, undermining its hegemonic principles. The former advocates the potentiality of instrumental rationality, the latter engages with values, demanding ethical consideration of the implications of the unmooring. The paper conceives of a way to underpin posthumanist thought to enable to serve a more effective critique of transhumanist aims.
This is a theoretical paper that outlines a history of transhumanist thought and the roots of posthumanism. It provides a partially reconstructed Enlightenment humanist framework to bolster the effectiveness of posthumanism as a critique of transhumanist thought.
The paper recongnizes Theodor Adorno’s conception that the central contradiction inherent to Enlightenment thinking is the entanglement of knowledge and power. Hence the metanarrative of progress as historical fact is fundamentally imbued with an imperial, colonizing force. For reason to achieve its promise as the organ of progress it must become self-aware of its own limitations and its own potential destructiveness. Humility is thus vital in the task of preventing instrumental reason leading to inhuman ends.
Whilst developments such as 'metahumanism' attempt to bring 'posthumanism' and 'transhumanism' into direct conversation, it is done from the perspective of uniting their positions. Here, I endeavour instead to consider their antithetical nature and in particular whether posthumanism can provide an effective critique of transhumanism. Drawing on Adorno and Feenberg in particular I attempt to justify posthuamanist theory but also to employ a partially reconstructed Enlightenment humanism to bolster its fruitfulness as a critique of transhumanism.

JournalInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
ISSN0144-333X
Year2020
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-09-2019-0179
Web address (URL)https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-09-2019-0179
Publication dates
Online29 Apr 2020
Publication process dates
Accepted27 Mar 2020
Deposited01 Apr 2020
Copyright holder© 2020 Emerald Publishing Limited
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/87wvq

Download files

Accepted author manuscript
On Progress and Reason.pdf
License: All rights reserved
File access level: Anyone

  • 50
    total views
  • 28
    total downloads
  • 4
    views this month
  • 5
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Beverley
Thomas, A. 2020. Beverley.
Review of Francesca Ferrando, ‘Philosophical Posthumanism’
Thomas, A. 2020. Review of Francesca Ferrando, ‘Philosophical Posthumanism’. Theory, Culture and Society Website Reviews.
Review: Feenberg, Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason
Thomas, A. 2018. Review: Feenberg, Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Theory, Culture and Society Website Reviews.
The Undream
Thomas, A. 2014. The Undream.
ChatRoulette
Thomas, A. 2013. ChatRoulette.
Portobello: Attack of the Clones
Thomas, A. 2011. Portobello: Attack of the Clones.
Entropy
Thomas, A. 2011. Entropy.