Sex Differences in Sexual Arousal and Finger Length Ratio

Article


Holmes, L., Watts-Overall, T., Slettevold, E., Gruia, D. C. and Rieger, G. 2022. Sex Differences in Sexual Arousal and Finger Length Ratio. The Journal of Sex Research. 59 (4), pp. 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1874262
AuthorsHolmes, L., Watts-Overall, T., Slettevold, E., Gruia, D. C. and Rieger, G.
Abstract

Most men show sexual arousal to one, preferred sex, whereas most women respond to both sexes, regardless of their sexual orientation. A different research program indicates that men have lower second-to-fourth finger length ratios (2D:4D) than women, possibly because men are exposed to higher levels of androgens during prenatal development. We hypothesized that sex differences in sexual arousal patterns are influenced by prenatal androgen exposure and would thus be explained by sex differences in 2D:4D. We measured the sexual response patterns of 139 men and 179 women via genital arousal and pupil dilation to erotic videos, in addition to their 2D:4D. Compared to women, men showed stronger responses to one sex over the other, although this pattern was clearer in genital arousal than pupil dilation. Men also had lower 2D:4D than women. However, there was no evidence that sex differences in sexual arousal related to sex differences in 2D:4D. Thus, whichever factor explains sex differences in sexual arousal patterns may not be reflected in 2D:4D.

JournalThe Journal of Sex Research
Journal citation59 (4), pp. 515-523
ISSN0022-4499
Year2022
PublisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1874262
Publication dates
Online01 Feb 2021
Publication process dates
Deposited08 Feb 2021
FunderEconomic and Social Research Council
American Institute of Bisexuality
University of Essex
Copyright holder© 2021 The Authors
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/88z1w

Download files


Publisher's version
Sex Differences in Sexual Arousal and Finger Length Ratio.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Anyone

  • 126
    total views
  • 217
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Sexual Orientation, Sexual Arousal, and Finger Length Ratios in Women
Holmes, L., Watts-Overall, T., Slettevold, E., Gruia, D. C., Raines, J. and Rieger, G. 2021. Sexual Orientation, Sexual Arousal, and Finger Length Ratios in Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50, p. 3419–3432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02095-5
Patterns of Genital Sexual Arousal in Transgender Men
Raines, J., Holmes, L., Watts-Overall, T., Slettevold, E., Gruia, D. C., Orbell, S. and Rieger, G. 2021. Patterns of Genital Sexual Arousal in Transgender Men. Psychological Science. 32 (4), pp. 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620971654
Sexual Arousal Patterns of Identical Twins with Discordant Sexual Orientations
Watts, T. M., Holmes, L., Raines, J., Orbell, S. and Rieger, G. 2018. Sexual Arousal Patterns of Identical Twins with Discordant Sexual Orientations. Scientific Reports. 8 (Art. 14970). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33188-2
Finger Length Ratios of Identical Twins with Discordant Sexual Orientations
Watts, T. M., Holmes, L., Raines, J., Orbell, S. and Rieger, G. 2018. Finger Length Ratios of Identical Twins with Discordant Sexual Orientations. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 47 (8), p. 2435–2444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1262-z
Gender nonconformity of identical twins with discordant sexual orientations: Evidence from childhood photographs
Watts, T. M., Holmes, L., Raines, J., Orbell, S. and Rieger, G. 2018. Gender nonconformity of identical twins with discordant sexual orientations: Evidence from childhood photographs. Developmental Psychology. 54 (4), p. 788–801. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000461
Pupil Dilation to Explicit and Non-Explicit Sexual Stimuli
Watts, T. M., Holmes, L., Savin-Williams, R. C. and Rieger, G. 2016. Pupil Dilation to Explicit and Non-Explicit Sexual Stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 46 (1), pp. 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0801-8