Racial diversity at work: a psychodynamic perspective

Article


Penda, V. and Dineva, S. 2024. Racial diversity at work: a psychodynamic perspective. Psychodynamic Practice. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2024.2348532
AuthorsPenda, V. and Dineva, S.
Abstract

This study aimed to provide new insights for diversity management by applying the psychodynamic principles of defence mechanisms and basic assumption mentality. Diversity is an important part of modern society and organisations. However, the evidence of diversity management remains inconsistent. Two opposing social theories have primarily been the focus of the scientific literature. Some scholars argue that these theories may be insufficient as they do not necessarily account for more covert forms of discrimination and experiences. We adopt a psychodynamic perspective because it has long promoted the influence of covert behaviours and subjective experiences. Ten participants were recruited using the purposeful sampling method. Participants identified as either being White, Black, Asian, or Other which was one of the three main inclusion criteria. The second being participants had no formal managerial authority and all worked in racially diverse teams in different organisations. Participants were recruited from organisations in The UK, The Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, and Australia. Individual interviews lasted 20–30 minutes and were conducted using Microsoft Teams and transcripts were coded using Nvivo 12. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was applied to uncover themes and psychodynamic principles were applied to make sense of participants lived experiences. The findings suggest that participants’ anxieties were exacerbated by socio-environmental factors and adverse workplace experiences that negatively interfered with job performance and relationships in the workplace. Ethnic minorities reported more stressors primarily due to a conflict and discrepancy between the self and their work environment. Reducing uncertainty, leadership emotional competence, and effectively managing work boundaries were protective factors. Recommendations and limitations are discussed.

JournalPsychodynamic Practice
Journal citationIn Press
ISSN1475-3626
Year2024
PublisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2024.2348532
Publication dates
Online03 May 2024
Publication process dates
Accepted24 Apr 2024
Deposited16 Jul 2024
Copyright holder© 2024 The Authors
Additional information

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychodynamic Practice on 03 May 2024, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2024.2348532

Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8y02z

Restricted files

Accepted author manuscript

  • 8
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 8
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as