Social Information Processing: A Useful Framework for Educational Psychology
Article
Cooke, T. 2017. Social Information Processing: A Useful Framework for Educational Psychology. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 50–69. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8870z
Authors | Cooke, T. |
---|---|
Abstract | The Social Information Processing (SIP) model (Crick & Dodge, 1994; Dodge, 1986; Lemerise & Arsenio, 2000) offers a detailed framework for understanding the way that a child makes sense of and acts in social situations. When applied in the context of a wider biopsychosocial conceptualisation (Dodge & Pettit, 2003), it offers a comprehensive model that is in accordance with current ways of thinking about human behaviour. This article reviews the history of the SIP model and considers the evidence for each step of the SIP model. In the light of these findings, the article considers possible reasons for the relative oversight of this model by the educational psychology profession. After presenting some reasons why it is still of contemporary relevance, this article sets out the ways that an SIP-informed approach offers a range of questions for assessment and intervention. |
Journal | Educational Psychology Research and Practice |
Journal citation | 3 (1), p. 50–69 |
ISSN | 2059-8963 |
Year | 2017 |
Publisher | School of Psychology, University of East London |
Publisher's version | License File Access Level Anyone |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8870z |
Publication dates | |
Online | 2017 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 17 Sep 2020 |
Copyright holder | © 2017 The Author |
https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8870z
Download files
Publisher's version
Educational Psychology Research and Practice 2017 Spring Cooke.pdf | ||
License: CC BY 4.0 | ||
File access level: Anyone |
Explore this article
Explore this article
Editorial
Thomas, M. 2017. Editorial. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 1. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88706Professional Courage: What Does It Mean for Practitioner Psychologists?
Ashton, R. 2017. Professional Courage: What Does It Mean for Practitioner Psychologists? Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 2–14. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88707Reflections on the Role of the Educational Psychologist Within a Multi-Academy Trust
Rumble, A. and Thomas, G. 2017. Reflections on the Role of the Educational Psychologist Within a Multi-Academy Trust. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 15–28. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88708Literacy Interventions Promoting Adolescent Reading Engagement and Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review
Cockroft, C. and Atkinson, C. 2017. Literacy Interventions Promoting Adolescent Reading Engagement and Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 29–49. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88709Sleep issues: Can EPs do more?
Bryant, A. 2017. Sleep issues: Can EPs do more? Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 70–74. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88712An Exploration of Current Research Into the Prevalence, Aetiology and Impact of Sleep Difficulties in Children and Young People With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Using the Evidence to Provide Effective Intervention
Winter, S. 2017. An Exploration of Current Research Into the Prevalence, Aetiology and Impact of Sleep Difficulties in Children and Young People With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Using the Evidence to Provide Effective Intervention. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 75–85. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88713Universal Basic Income: A Psychological Impact Assessment
Griffin, V., Zlotowitz, S., McLoughlin, E. and Kagan, C. 2017. Universal Basic Income: A Psychological Impact Assessment. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 86–111. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88714Book Review: What If Everybody Understood Child Development?
Hulme, S. 2017. Book Review: What If Everybody Understood Child Development? Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 3 (1), p. 112. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88715533
total views5601
total downloads1
views this month30
downloads this month