Director Committed for Contempt of Court

Article


Reynolds, M. 2024. Director Committed for Contempt of Court. The Company Lawyer. 45 (9).
AuthorsReynolds, M.
Abstract

The integrity of international commercial arbitration depends upon compliance with the tribunal's award. In practice this is rarely a problem, but sometimes cases occur where there is failure to comply with the award. This strikes at the heart of the consensual nature of the process. Such possibility should be considered by a claimant before giving notice of arbitration, especially regarding the jurisdiction in which the award may be enforced. In this case the judge has given a clear example of how the courts deal with an abuse of the process and how contempt of court can lead to imprisonment. The case gives a clear signal that our courts robustly support international arbitration in that the learned judge, Mrs Justice Cockerel, robustly enforced an international arbitration award and penalised a defaulting defendant director for contempt.

JournalThe Company Lawyer
Journal citation45 (9)
ISSN0144-1027
Year2024
PublisherSweet and Maxwell
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Web address (URL)https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/en-gb/products/the-company-lawyer-journal-and-ejournal-subscription-30928114
Publication dates
Online2024
Publication process dates
Deposited20 Mar 2025
Copyright holder© 2024 The Author
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8z35y

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
Director Committed for Contempt of Court.pdf
License: All rights reserved
File access level: Anyone

  • 3
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 3
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

International Arbitration: The Tide Rises and Falls, but the Sands of Error Crumble
Reynolds, M. 2025. International Arbitration: The Tide Rises and Falls, but the Sands of Error Crumble. The Company Lawyer. 46 (2).
A Case of Libre Recherche Scientifique
Reynolds, M. 2024. A Case of Libre Recherche Scientifique. The Company Lawyer. 46 (9).
Too Big to Fail?
Reynolds, M. 2023. Too Big to Fail? The Company Lawyer. 44 (8).
Of Conflicting Laws and Recognition: Unicredit Bank GmbH v Ruschemalliance LLC
Reynolds, M. 2023. Of Conflicting Laws and Recognition: Unicredit Bank GmbH v Ruschemalliance LLC. The Company Lawyer. 47 (10).
Rudimentary Prototypes in Case Management Techniques (1919–49)
Reynolds, M. 2023. Rudimentary Prototypes in Case Management Techniques (1919–49). in: Coulson, P. and Sawtell, D. (ed.) The History of the Technology and Construction Court on Its 150th Anniversary: Rewriting the Rules Oxford, UK Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 49-82
Instruments of Peacemaking 1870-1914
Reynolds, M. 2021. Instruments of Peacemaking 1870-1914. Oxford, New York, Dublin Bloomsbury Publishing.