Russian Anti-Suit Injunctions: Impediments to International Commercial Arbitration

Article


Reynolds, M. 2022. Russian Anti-Suit Injunctions: Impediments to International Commercial Arbitration. The Company Lawyer. 43 (9), pp. 290-291.
AuthorsReynolds, M.
Abstract

The recent amendment to the Russian Commercial Procedural Code raises some difficult issues for practitioners dealing with Russian companies in the context of seeking redress in international commercial arbitration or through commercial litigation.

This amendment to the Russian Arbitrazh (i.e., Commercial) Procedure Code (Federal Law no.171-FZ) was aimed at protecting the rights of natural persons and legal entities in connection with sanctions imposed by foreign countries. The amendment (new articles 248.1 and 248.2 to the Arbitrazh Procedure Code) came into force on 19 June 2020 granting exclusive Russian jurisdiction over disputes: where one of parties is a person or legal entity placed under sanctions by a foreign state, state union or institution, or disputes between Russian or foreign entities that are based on or concern foreign sanctions implemented against Russian citizens or Russian legal entities.

JournalThe Company Lawyer
Journal citation43 (9), pp. 290-291
ISSN0144-1027
Year2022
PublisherSweet and Maxwell
Accepted author manuscript
License
Web address (URL)https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/en-gb/products/the-company-lawyer-journal-and-ejournal-subscription-30928114
Publication dates
Online2022
Publication process dates
Deposited22 Apr 2025
Copyright holder© 2022 Thomson Reuters and Contributors
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8z3yv

Download files

  • 17
    total views
  • 9
    total downloads
  • 8
    views this month
  • 8
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

International Arbitration: The Tide Rises and Falls, but the Sands of Error Crumble
Reynolds, M. 2025. International Arbitration: The Tide Rises and Falls, but the Sands of Error Crumble. The Company Lawyer. 46 (2).
Director Committed for Contempt of Court
Reynolds, M. 2024. Director Committed for Contempt of Court. The Company Lawyer. 45 (9).
A Case of Libre Recherche Scientifique
Reynolds, M. 2024. A Case of Libre Recherche Scientifique. The Company Lawyer. 46 (9).
Too Big to Fail?
Reynolds, M. 2023. Too Big to Fail? The Company Lawyer. 44 (8).
Of Conflicting Laws and Recognition: Unicredit Bank GmbH v Ruschemalliance LLC
Reynolds, M. 2023. Of Conflicting Laws and Recognition: Unicredit Bank GmbH v Ruschemalliance LLC. The Company Lawyer. 47 (10).
Rudimentary Prototypes in Case Management Techniques (1919–49)
Reynolds, M. 2023. Rudimentary Prototypes in Case Management Techniques (1919–49). in: Coulson, P. and Sawtell, D. (ed.) The History of the Technology and Construction Court on Its 150th Anniversary: Rewriting the Rules Oxford, UK Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 49-82
Supervisory jurisdiction over arbitral tribunals challenges to interim orders in India
Reynolds, M. 2022. Supervisory jurisdiction over arbitral tribunals challenges to interim orders in India. The Company Lawyer. pp. 323-324.
Instruments of Peacemaking 1870-1914
Reynolds, M. 2021. Instruments of Peacemaking 1870-1914. Oxford, New York, Dublin Bloomsbury Publishing.