Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: Reflections on a meta-study
Barnes, Jemima, Caddick, Nick, Clarke, Nicola J., Cromby, John, McDermott, Hilary, Willis, M. and Wiltshire, Gareth 2014. Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: Reflections on a meta-study. Qualitative Methods in Psychology. 17 (Spring).
|Authors||Barnes, Jemima, Caddick, Nick, Clarke, Nicola J., Cromby, John, McDermott, Hilary, Willis, M. and Wiltshire, Gareth|
A short report is provided of a meta-study of methodological pluralism in qualitative research; that is, of the use of two or more qualitative methods to analyse the same data set. Ten eligible papers were identified and assessed. Their contents are described with respect to theory, methods and findings, and their possible implications discussed in relation to a series of wider debates in qualitative research more generally.
|Journal||Qualitative Methods in Psychology|
|Journal citation||17 (Spring)|
|Publisher||British Psychological Society (South west Review)|
|Accepted author manuscript|
|Web address (URL)||https://shop.bps.org.uk/publications/publication-by-series/qualitative-methods-in-psychology-bulletin/qmip-bulletin-issue-17-spring-2014.html|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||22 May 2017|
|Copyright information||This is a pre-publication version of the following article: Barnes, J., Caddick, N., Cromby, J., Clarke, N.J., Mcdermott, H., Willis, M.E. and Wiltshire, G., 2014. Methodological pluralism in qualitative research: reflections on a meta-study. British Psychological Society (SW Review), QMiP Bulletin Issue 17, Spring, 2014, 35-41. Special Issue: The place of qualitative methods in mixed methods research.|
Accepted author manuscript
11views this month
17downloads this month