Response
Article
Briggs, S. 2018. Response. British Journal of Psychotherapy. 34 (4), pp. 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12406
Authors | Briggs, S. |
---|---|
Abstract | This response welcomes Bob Hinshelwood's plea for research in the psychoanalytic setting, and his discussion of processes for clarifying concepts and for the comparative examination of different positions. I suggest that the aims of Hinshelwood's project could be more effectively realized within a social science approach and discuss some implications for ways of conceptualizing science, theory and subjectivity. I suggest that the focus for research within the psychoanalytic setting should include how clinical practice is evolving under changing social contexts. |
Journal | British Journal of Psychotherapy |
Journal citation | 34 (4), pp. 555-561 |
ISSN | 0265-9883 |
Year | 2018 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Accepted author manuscript | License |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12406 |
Web address (URL) | https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12406 |
Publication dates | |
24 Oct 2018 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 14 Feb 2019 |
Accepted | 21 Jul 2018 |
Accepted | 21 Jul 2018 |
Copyright information | © 2018 BPF and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Briggs, Stephen (2018) ‘Response’, British Journal of Psychotherapy, 34(4), pp. 555-561, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12406. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. |
Permalink -
https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/84612
Download files
Accepted author manuscript
7935.pdf | ||
License: Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions |
193
total views268
total downloads0
views this month2
downloads this month