Considering cross-phase peer mentoring in ITE: what can each party bring to the table?
Article
Lewis, E. 2014. Considering cross-phase peer mentoring in ITE: what can each party bring to the table? Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), pp. 22-27. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.859y4
Authors | Lewis, E. |
---|---|
Abstract | Whilst the centrality of mentoring to successful outcomes in Initial Teacher Education (ITE) in England is uncontroversial and widely discussed, there has been less research on peer mentoring. Much of the literature that exists focuses on the role peer mentoring can play in helping tertiary students or beginning teachers to adjust to their new role and legitimise concerns (Draves & Koops 2011). However, there has been a dearth of research on the efficacy of peer mentoring in developing the subject knowledge and pedagogy of ITE students. This small-scale exploratory study looks at whether peer mentoring in ITE can be mutually beneficial in developing each member’s subject knowledge and pedagogy, where dyads are training to teach different age ranges. This cross-phased pairing aims to provide a liminal space where the gap between theory and practice is negotiated, and individual goals can be addressed. |
Keywords | cross-phase; peer mentoring; third space; virtual mentoring |
Journal | Research in Teacher Education |
Research in Teacher Education | |
Journal citation | 4 (1), pp. 22-27 |
ISSN | 2047-3818 |
Year | 2014 |
Publisher | University of East London, Cass School of Education and Communities |
Publisher's version | License CC BY |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.859y4 |
Publication dates | |
20 May 2014 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 22 May 2014 |
Copyright information | © The author 2014 |
https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/859y4
Download files
Explore this article
Explore this article
Editorial
Garby-Czerniawski, G. 2014. Editorial. Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), p. 3. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8917qComputer programming, ICT and gender in the classroom: a male-dominated domain or a female preserve?
Morris, David and Trushell, John 2014. Computer programming, ICT and gender in the classroom: a male-dominated domain or a female preserve? Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), pp. 4-9. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.859y6The role of practical experience: toward an ITE signature pedagogy
Ayres, D. 2014. The role of practical experience: toward an ITE signature pedagogy. Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), pp. 10-16. https://doi.org/10.15123/PUB.3631Early years education: are young students intrinsically or extrinsically motivated towards school activities? A discussion about the effects of rewards on young children’s learning
Theodotou, E. 2014. Early years education: are young students intrinsically or extrinsically motivated towards school activities? A discussion about the effects of rewards on young children’s learning. Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), pp. 17-21. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.859y7Action research – questioning techniques in the FE sector: a qualitative study
Torbrand, Pepita 2014. Action research – questioning techniques in the FE sector: a qualitative study. Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), pp. 28-37. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.859y8Barriers and motivators to attaining a school-based MA in Education: a case study
Etherington, M. 2014. Barriers and motivators to attaining a school-based MA in Education: a case study. Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), pp. 38-42. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.859y3‘I was never much good at writing’: trainee teachers’ attributions in writing
Wray, David 2014. ‘I was never much good at writing’: trainee teachers’ attributions in writing. Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), pp. 43-49. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.859y9Book reviews
Miyata, Cathy, Gordon, Shearon, Trimmer-Platman, T. and King, Grant 2014. Book reviews. Research in Teacher Education. 4 (1), pp. 50-54.185
total views96
total downloads3
views this month0
downloads this month