The Use of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for School Refusal Behaviour in Educational Psychology Practice
Article
Lee, H. 2019. The Use of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for School Refusal Behaviour in Educational Psychology Practice. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 5 (2), p. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8873w
Authors | Lee, H. |
---|---|
Abstract | Understanding around school refusal behaviour has significantly changed over time, from beliefs that it stemmed from a phobia, to more recent views that the behaviour serves a function for the child or young person. These changes run in parallel to a dominant medicalised and within-child view of school refusal, which has subsequently impacted on the interventions used by professionals. This article looks at the evidence base around the most commonly used intervention, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) (Maynard et al., 2018), to determine whether its extensive use is validated. The use of this intervention in educational psychology practice is explored, with consideration for the merits of finding a “gold standard” intervention in comparison to adopting a more individualised approach. To support a more individualised and systemic approach, Nuttall and Woods’ (2013) “Ecological Model of Successful Reintegration” is explored in relation to educational psychology practice. |
Journal | Educational Psychology Research and Practice |
Journal citation | 5 (2), p. 1–13 |
ISSN | 2059-8963 |
Year | 2019 |
Publisher | School of Psychology, University of East London |
Publisher's version | License File Access Level Anyone |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8873w |
Publication dates | |
Online | 2019 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 18 Sep 2020 |
Copyright holder | © 2019 The Author |
https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8873w
Download files
Publisher's version
Educational Psychology Research and Practice 2019 5 2 Lee.pdf | ||
License: CC BY 4.0 | ||
File access level: Anyone |
Explore this article
Explore this article
Editorial
Thomas, M. 2019. Editorial. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 5 (2), p. 1. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88738The Process of Psychological Assessment: A Critique of Non-Participatory Observations Within Educational Psychology Practice and the Process of Psychological Assessment
Speed, E. 2019. The Process of Psychological Assessment: A Critique of Non-Participatory Observations Within Educational Psychology Practice and the Process of Psychological Assessment. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 5 (2), p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88739Educational Psychologists as Scientist Practitioners: A Critical Synthesis of Existing Professional Frameworks by a Consciously Incompetent Trainee
Sedgwick, A. 2019. Educational Psychologists as Scientist Practitioners: A Critical Synthesis of Existing Professional Frameworks by a Consciously Incompetent Trainee. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 5 (2), p. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8873qDeveloping Therapeutic Interventions in EP Practice: Reflections on Unconscious Processes and Promoting the Child’s Voice
Ng, R. 2019. Developing Therapeutic Interventions in EP Practice: Reflections on Unconscious Processes and Promoting the Child’s Voice. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 5 (2), p. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8873vTo What Extent Is the Thrive Intervention Grounded in Research and Theory?
Gibby-Leversuch, R., Field, J. and Cooke, T. 2019. To What Extent Is the Thrive Intervention Grounded in Research and Theory? Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 5 (2), p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8873xReview of the Book: The Psychology of Effective Studying: How to Succeed in Your Degree, by P. Penn
Bray, D. 2019. Review of the Book: The Psychology of Effective Studying: How to Succeed in Your Degree, by P. Penn. Educational Psychology Research and Practice. 5 (2), p. 1. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8873y719
total views1379
total downloads3
views this month3
downloads this month