How do practitioners in early years provision promote Fundamental British Values?

Article


Robson, J. 2018. How do practitioners in early years provision promote Fundamental British Values? International Journal of Early Years Education. 27 (1), pp. 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1507904
AuthorsRobson, J.
Abstract

In 2015 the United Kingdom government harnessed early childhood education and care (ECEC) providers to its anti-terrorism strategy by placing them within the scope of the Counter Terrorism and Security Act 2015 (Great Britain Parliament, 2015). They became subject to the ‘Prevent Duty’ which requires them to have due regard to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism. However, the promotion of Fundamental British Values (FBV), as a specific measure to prevent young children being drawn into terrorism, has raised questions about the role of the ECEC sector as an instrument of counter terrorism policy. This paper analyses the ways in which early childhood practitioners mediated the requirement to promote FBV through their pedagogical practice. Although practitioners are commissioned to mediate specific values formulated in the political arena (Eirnarsdottir et al, 2015) their response was complex and multi layered. Whilst a public display of compliance to FBV was performative (Butler, 1997) values education was an everyday pedagogical practice unconstrained by the instituted definitions of FBV. Practitioners deployed a contextual moral pedagogy (Basourakos, 1999) where children construct understandings of moral values and practices characterised by rich democratic dialogues.

JournalInternational Journal of Early Years Education
Journal citation27 (1), pp. 95-110
ISSN0966-9760
Year2018
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Accepted author manuscript
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1507904
Web address (URL)https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1507904
Publication dates
Online15 Aug 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited23 Jul 2018
Accepted18 Jul 2018
Accepted18 Jul 2018
Copyright information© 2018 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Early Years Education on 15/08/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09669760.2018.1507904.
LicenseAll rights reserved (under embargo)
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/84720

  • 137
    total views
  • 197
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 9
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Lecturing within the panoptic scheme of prevent in an English University
Robson, J. and Hunt, R. 2021. Lecturing within the panoptic scheme of prevent in an English University. Critical Studies on Terrorism. 14 (4), pp. 578-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2021.1996935
An Action Research Inquiry: facilitating early childhood studies undergraduate researcher development through Group Supervision
Robson, J. 2021. An Action Research Inquiry: facilitating early childhood studies undergraduate researcher development through Group Supervision. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1872395
Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education
Jerome, L., Busher. J., Armstrong, M. A., Choudhury, T., da Silva, R., Elwick, A., Fontana, G., James, N., Lewis, J., Robson, J., Svennevig, H. and Thomas, P. 2020. Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education. in: Busher, J. and Jerome, L. (ed.) The Prevent Duty in Education: Impact, Enactment and Implications Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 159-169
Enacting the Prevent Duty in Early Childhood Education Settings
Robson, J. 2020. Enacting the Prevent Duty in Early Childhood Education Settings. in: Busher, J. and Jerome, L. (ed.) The Prevent Duty in Education: Impact, Enactment and Implications Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 77-97
How do early childhood education leaders navigate ethical dilemmas within the context of marketised provision in England?
Robson, J. and Martin, E. 2019. How do early childhood education leaders navigate ethical dilemmas within the context of marketised provision in England? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. 20 (1), pp. 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949119827031
Participatory pedagogy for values education in early childhood education
Robson, J. 2019. Participatory pedagogy for values education in early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 27 (3), pp. 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2019.1600811
Responses to the marginalisation of Roma young people in education in an age of austerity in the United Kingdom
Robson, J. 2017. Responses to the marginalisation of Roma young people in education in an age of austerity in the United Kingdom. in: Blackman, Shane and Rogers, Ruth (ed.) Youth marginality in Britain: Contemporary studies of austerity Policy Press.
Welcome to the Roma? Education practitioners attempts to resist a dominant negative discourse about Roma Children.
Robson, J. 2015. Welcome to the Roma? Education practitioners attempts to resist a dominant negative discourse about Roma Children. Today's Children are Tomorrow's Parents. 40-41, pp. 46-55.
Early Years Teachers and young children’s rights: the need for critical dialogue
Robson, J. 2016. Early Years Teachers and young children’s rights: the need for critical dialogue. Research in Teacher Education. 6 (1), pp. 6-11. https://doi.org/10.15123/PUB.5091
Research in Teacher Education: Volume 6, No.1, May 2016
Czerniawski, G., Robson, J., Robertson, G., Conner, Lara, Mohammed, R., Devici, Isa, White, R., White, Simone, Uppal, Gurmit, Pafford, Fran, Kidd, W. and Bannocks, Rebecca 2016. Research in Teacher Education: Volume 6, No.1, May 2016. The School of Education and Communities, University of East London. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.891ww