Peer mentors' experiences and perceptions of mentoring in undergraduate health and sports science programmes

Article


Abrahamson, E., Puzzar, C., Ferro, M. S. and Bailey, S. 2019. Peer mentors' experiences and perceptions of mentoring in undergraduate health and sports science programmes. Journal of Pedagogical Research. 3 (2), pp. 21-37. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2019254158
AuthorsAbrahamson, E., Puzzar, C., Ferro, M. S. and Bailey, S.
Abstract

Peer mentoring schemes are increasingly visible within professional practice, and in recent years, universities have integrated mentoring across undergraduate programmes. In order to provide the appropriate support to peer mentors and contribute to the future development and success of peer-mentoring schemes, it is necessary to investigate not only the benefits afforded to mentees, but also peer mentors' perceptions of their experiences. This small-scale qualitative study was conducted with participants who were recruited from the peer-mentoring scheme across two professional undergraduate health programmes: Podiatry and Sports Therapy. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the early experiences and expectations of being a mentor, mentorship activities, reasons and personal narratives for becoming a mentor, and the effectiveness of the training they received. Findings suggest that constructive and destructive friction exist between how mentors perceive their mentorship role and the strategies and skills they develop and use during their mentorship experiences.The study concludes with recommendations for new mentors and implementation of mentorship schemes within the widening population context of higher education.

JournalJournal of Pedagogical Research
Journal citation3 (2), pp. 21-37
ISSN2602-3717
Year2019
PublisherJournal of Pedagogical Research
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2019254158
Web address (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2019254158
Publication dates
Online08 Aug 2019
Publication process dates
Accepted25 Jul 2019
Deposited15 Aug 2019
Copyright holder© 2019 The Authors
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/86y4x

Download files


Publisher's version
document.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Anyone

  • 180
    total views
  • 140
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Re-positioning SoTL toward the T-shaped Community
Eady, M., Abrahamson, E., Green, C., Arcellana-Panlilio, M., Hatfield, L. and Namaste, N. 2021. Re-positioning SoTL toward the T-shaped Community. Teaching and Learning Inquiry. 9 (1), pp. 262-278. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.18
Journal of Impact Cultures: Volume 1, Issue 1 (Special Edition, May 2020)
Wilson, M., Abrahamson, E., Gilbert, F., Botticello, J. and Mann, J. 2020. Journal of Impact Cultures: Volume 1, Issue 1 (Special Edition, May 2020). CIRCLE, University of East London. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.88061
Statement of Intent: From the Founding Co-Editors
Abrahamson, E. and Mann, J. 2020. Statement of Intent: From the Founding Co-Editors. Journal of Impact Cultures. 1 (1), pp. iii-vi. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8805w
An International Interdisciplinary Writing Group: Perspectives on Building Partnerships and Developing Community
Kensington-Miller, B., Oliver, C., Morón-García, S., Manarin, K., Abrahamson, E., Simmons, N. and Deshler, J. 2019. An International Interdisciplinary Writing Group: Perspectives on Building Partnerships and Developing Community. in: Simmons, N. and Singh, A. (ed.) Critical Collaborative Communities: Academic Writing Partnerships, Groups, and Retreats BRILL. pp. 228-241
Muscle Testing – A Concise Manual
Abrahamson, E. and Lanston, J. 2019. Muscle Testing – A Concise Manual. Handspring Publishing.
Review of the SoTL a Guide for Scientists, Engineers and Mathematicians
Abrahamson, E. 2019. Review of the SoTL a Guide for Scientists, Engineers and Mathematicians. Teaching & Learning Enquiry. 7 (1), pp. 196-197. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.1.14
For whom is the feedback intended? A student-focused critical analysis of turnitin software as a tool for learning
Abrahamson, E. and Mann, J. 2018. For whom is the feedback intended? A student-focused critical analysis of turnitin software as a tool for learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research. 2 (3), pp. 146-166.
Troublesome Knowledge of SoTL
Manarin, Karen and Abrahamson, E. 2016. Troublesome Knowledge of SoTL. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 10 (2), p. Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2016.100202
Making Sense of Learning Human Anatomy and Physiology
Abrahamson, E. and Langston, J. 2016. Making Sense of Learning Human Anatomy and Physiology. Lotus Publishing.