For whom is the feedback intended? A student-focused critical analysis of turnitin software as a tool for learning

Article


Abrahamson, E. and Mann, J. 2018. For whom is the feedback intended? A student-focused critical analysis of turnitin software as a tool for learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research. 2 (3), pp. 146-166.
AuthorsAbrahamson, E. and Mann, J.
Abstract

Online systems like Turnitin have been identified as way to improve the quality of work that students submit. Related to this, recent studies concerned with Turnitin have foregrounded its capacity as an educative tool that improves students’ understanding of academic misconduct. Academic writing, and the ability of students to appreciate feedback as a significant component of learning is often hidden behind the technological platform of Turnitin. In many cases Turnitin is conceived as software used to detect dishonesty and frame students for inappropriate citation, or misuse of referencing. We seek to address this, by examining more the pedagogical value of online feedback systems in the context of widening participation and TEF. Significantly expanding the discussion beyond plagiarism, taking a genre-based approach, and positioning both academic writing and Turnitin/feedback within the context of academic literacies, this paper intervenes with current debates. The case study draws on qualitative data recorded from students, tutors, and the Turnitin software system. By doing so, insights are generated into best software practice that have profound implications for HEIs, most especially those with widening participation agendas. Based on these data, the study provides a series of practical software development recommendations to help raise standards amongst student writing.

JournalJournal of Pedagogical Research
Journal citation2 (3), pp. 146-166
ISSN2602-3717
Year2018
PublisherJournal of Pedagogical Research
Publisher's version
License
Web address (URL)http://www.ijopr.com/index.php/ijopr/article/view/62
Publication dates
Online03 Dec 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited06 Dec 2018
Accepted15 Nov 2018
Accepted15 Nov 2018
Copyright information© 2018 The authors
LicenseCC BY 4.0
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8457z

  • 20
    total views
  • 34
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 3
    downloads this month

Related outputs

An International Interdisciplinary Writing Group: Perspectives on Building Partnerships and Developing Community
Kensington-Miller, B., Oliver, C., Morón-García, S., Manarin, K., Abrahamson, E., Simmons, N. and Deshler, J. 2019. An International Interdisciplinary Writing Group: Perspectives on Building Partnerships and Developing Community. in: Simmons, N. and Singh, A. (ed.) Critical Collaborative Communities: Academic Writing Partnerships, Groups, and Retreats BRILL. pp. 228-241
Muscle Testing – A Concise Manual
Abrahamson, E. and Lanston, J. 2019. Muscle Testing – A Concise Manual. Handspring Publishing.
Review of the SoTL a Guide for Scientists, Engineers and Mathematicians
Abrahamson, E. 2019. Review of the SoTL a Guide for Scientists, Engineers and Mathematicians. Teaching & Learning Enquiry. 7 (1), pp. 196-197.
Peer mentors' experiences and perceptions of mentoring in undergraduate health and sports science programmes
Abrahamson, E., Puzzar, C., Ferro, M. S. and Bailey, S. 2019. Peer mentors' experiences and perceptions of mentoring in undergraduate health and sports science programmes. Journal of Pedagogical Research. 3 (2), pp. 21-37.
Using Turnitin to improve academic writing: an action research inquiry
Mann, J. 2016. Using Turnitin to improve academic writing: an action research inquiry. Research in Teacher Education. 6 (2), pp. 16-22.
Troublesome Knowledge of SoTL
Manarin, Karen and Abrahamson, E. 2016. Troublesome Knowledge of SoTL. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 10 (2), p. Article 2.
Making Sense of Learning Human Anatomy and Physiology
Abrahamson, E. and Langston, J. 2016. Making Sense of Learning Human Anatomy and Physiology. Lotus Publishing.