Positive Semiotics
Article
Lomas, T. 2019. Positive Semiotics. Review of General Psychology. 23 (3), pp. 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019832849
Authors | Lomas, T. |
---|---|
Abstract | Although semiotics has historically been a focus of interest in psychology, its impact over recent decades has been fairly muted. Moreover, no systematic efforts have been made to study and understand it from a positive perspective, i.e., the way sign-systems are or can be “positive.” As such, this paper introduces the notion of “positive semiotics,” a label for the disparate research and theorising that is already underway across academia relating to this topic. The paper draws on the work of C. S. Peirce, particularly in terms of his triadic view of sign-systems as comprising a sign, an object, and an interpretant. The idea of positivity is then elucidated using the criterion of desirability, drawing on the work of James Pawelski. Attempts are also made to ascertain the nature of desirability, including normative forms (clarified here using the conceptual triad of goodness, truth, and beauty) and non-normative forms (understood as personal wants). The paper then considers four key semiotic channels – discursive language, body language, symbols, and art – looking at selective examples of how positive semiotics might pertain to that channel. It is hoped the paper will stimulate further interest in, and work on, a phenomenon that is of considerable importance to psychology and beyond. |
Journal | Review of General Psychology |
Journal citation | 23 (3), pp. 359-370 |
ISSN | 1089-2680 |
Year | 2019 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association for American Psychological Association, Society for General Psychology (Division 1) |
Accepted author manuscript | License File Access Level Anyone |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019832849 |
Web address (URL) | https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019832849 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 12 Mar 2019 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 01 Mar 2019 |
Accepted | 28 Jan 2019 |
Accepted | 28 Jan 2019 |
Copyright information | © American Psychological Association, 2019. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1177/1089268019832849. |
https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/844y1
Download files
228
total views643
total downloads1
views this month7
downloads this month