Overcoming the Challenge of a Visible Facial Difference at Interview: Pre-Familiarisation can be Effective

Article


Stone, A. and de Grouchy, C. 2024. Overcoming the Challenge of a Visible Facial Difference at Interview: Pre-Familiarisation can be Effective. Stigma and Health. In Press.
AuthorsStone, A. and de Grouchy, C.
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a candidate with a visible facial difference (VFD) may experience discrimination during recruitment. This study investigated whether a VFD imposes a disadvantage in a simulated job interview and whether pre-familiarisation to the candidate’s appearance can reduce the disadvantage. Participants (n = 128) observed a video of a job interview in one of three conditions: a short audio pre-familiarisation and no VFD at interview (Control); audio pre-familiarisation and VFD at interview (Unexpected); and video pre-familiarisation then VFD at interview (Familiarised). Participants subsequently evaluated the candidate on personal and professional traits. Results revealed higher evaluations in the Unexpected compared to Control condition for Professional Skills, Emotional Stability, and especially strongly for Warmth, attributed to positive discrimination. In the Familiarised condition, the evaluations lay between Control and Unexpected, the only significant difference being lower Warmth in Familiarised than Unexpected. Of particular interest, different traits were associated with the key variable of Role Suitability in the three conditions: in Control, Role Suitability correlated with the job-relevant traits of Emotional Stability and Professional Skills; in Unexpected, the association with Professional Skills was weaker, and there was a significant association with Warmth; in Familiarised, there were no significant associations. In the Familiarised condition, compared to Unexpected, participants found the candidate’s appearance less distracting, and believed the pre-familiarisation would help the interviewer. These results were interpreted as suggesting that a VFD may harm the candidate’s chances of being evaluated fairly on their merits, but this disadvantage may be partially overcome by pre-familiarisation.

Keywordsvisible facial difference; face; employment; discrimination; familiarisation
JournalStigma and Health
Journal citationIn Press
ISSN2376-6972
2376-6964
Year2024
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Publication process dates
Accepted11 Jun 2024
Deposited04 Jul 2024
Copyright holder© 2024, American Psychological Association
Additional information

This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article will be available, upon publication.

Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8xy28

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
Pre-familiarisation - manuscript with second revisions.pdf
License: All rights reserved
File access level: Anyone

  • 24
    total views
  • 4
    total downloads
  • 24
    views this month
  • 4
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Ethical Veganism project raw data and syntax in SPSS
Stone, A. 2022. Ethical Veganism project raw data and syntax in SPSS. School of Psychology, University of East London. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8v1w2
Facial disfigurement, categorical perception, and the influence of Disgust Sensitivity
Stone, A. 2021. Facial disfigurement, categorical perception, and the influence of Disgust Sensitivity. Visual Cognition. 29 (2), pp. 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1870184
Not all eyewitnesses are equal: Accent status, race and age interact to influence evaluations of testimony
Frumkin, L. A. and Stone, A. 2020. Not all eyewitnesses are equal: Accent status, race and age interact to influence evaluations of testimony. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice. 18 (2), pp. 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2020.1727806
Changing Negative Perceptions of Individuals With Facial Disfigurement: The Effectiveness of a Brief Intervention
Stone, A. and Fisher, V. 2020. Changing Negative Perceptions of Individuals With Facial Disfigurement: The Effectiveness of a Brief Intervention. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 42 (5), pp. 341-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1768394
Development and validation of the multi-dimensional questionnaire of scientifically unsubstantiated beliefs
Stone, A., Mcdermott, M., Abdi, Aishi, Cornwell, Brittanie, Matyas, Zsofia, Reed, Ruby and Watt, Rebecca 2018. Development and validation of the multi-dimensional questionnaire of scientifically unsubstantiated beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences. 128, pp. 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.024
Emotional responses to disfigured faces and Disgust Sensitivity: An eye-tracking study
Stone, A. and Potton, Anita 2017. Emotional responses to disfigured faces and Disgust Sensitivity: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Health Psychology. 24 (9), pp. 1191-1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317692856
Rational Thinking and Belief in Psychic Abilities: It Depends on Level of Involvement
Stone, A. 2016. Rational Thinking and Belief in Psychic Abilities: It Depends on Level of Involvement. Psychological Reports. 118 (1), pp. 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294115625261
Emotional Responses to Disfigured Faces: The Influences of Perceived Anonymity, Empathy, and Disgust Sensitivity
Stone, A. and Potton, Anita 2014. Emotional Responses to Disfigured Faces: The Influences of Perceived Anonymity, Empathy, and Disgust Sensitivity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 36 (6), pp. 520-532.
A study aimed to investigate the recruitment prospects of people with facial disfigurement and a contrasting group of wheelchair users
Stone, A. 2013. A study aimed to investigate the recruitment prospects of people with facial disfigurement and a contrasting group of wheelchair users. UEL Research and Knowledge Exchange Conference 2013. University of East London, London 26 Jun 2013 London University of East London.
When your face doesn't fit: employment discrimination against people with facial disfigurements
Stone, A. and Wright, Toby 2013. When your face doesn't fit: employment discrimination against people with facial disfigurements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 43 (3), pp. 515-526.
An avowal of prior scepticism enhances the credibility of an account of a paranormal event
Stone, A. 2013. An avowal of prior scepticism enhances the credibility of an account of a paranormal event. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 33 (3), pp. 260-281.
Evaluations of People Depicted With Facial Disfigurement Compared to Those With Mobility Impairment
Stone, A. and Wright, T. 2012. Evaluations of People Depicted With Facial Disfigurement Compared to Those With Mobility Impairment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 34 (3), pp. 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.674420
Face recognition and emotional valence: Processing without awareness by neurologically intact participants does not simulate covert recognition in prosopagnosia
Stone, A., Valentine, Tim and Davis, Rob 2001. Face recognition and emotional valence: Processing without awareness by neurologically intact participants does not simulate covert recognition in prosopagnosia. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 1 (2), pp. 183-191.
Accuracy of familiarity decisions to famous faces perceived without awareness depends on attitude to the target person and on response latency
Stone, A. and Valentine, Tim 2005. Accuracy of familiarity decisions to famous faces perceived without awareness depends on attitude to the target person and on response latency. Consciousness and Cognition. 14 (2), pp. 351-376.
Strength of visual percept generated by famous faces perceived without awareness: effects of affective valence, response latency, and visual field
Stone, A. and Valentine, Tim 2005. Strength of visual percept generated by famous faces perceived without awareness: effects of affective valence, response latency, and visual field. Consciousness and Cognition. 14 (3), pp. 548-564.
Attentional effects of masked famous faces (but not names) and subjective evaluations of a target person
Stone, A. 2011. Attentional effects of masked famous faces (but not names) and subjective evaluations of a target person. Perceptual & Motor Skills. 112 (2), pp. 451-476. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.22.PMS.112.2.451-476
Centre–surround inhibition is a general aspect of famous-person recognition: evidence from negative semantic priming from clearly visible primes
Stone, A. 2011. Centre–surround inhibition is a general aspect of famous-person recognition: evidence from negative semantic priming from clearly visible primes. Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0176-y
Angry and happy faces perceived without awareness: a comparison with the affective impact of masked famous faces
Stone, A. and Valentine, Tim 2007. Angry and happy faces perceived without awareness: a comparison with the affective impact of masked famous faces. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 19 (2), pp. 161-186.
The categorical structure of knowledge for famous people (and a novel application of centre–surround theory)
Stone, A. and Valentine, Tim 2007. The categorical structure of knowledge for famous people (and a novel application of centre–surround theory). Cognition. 104 (3), pp. 535-564.
Categorical priming of famous person recognition: a hitherto overlooked methodological factor can resolve a long-standing debate
Stone, A. 2008. Categorical priming of famous person recognition: a hitherto overlooked methodological factor can resolve a long-standing debate. Cognition. 108 (3), pp. 874-880.
Better the devil you know? Non-conscious processing of identity and affect of famous faces
Stone, A. and Valentine, Tim 2004. Better the devil you know? Non-conscious processing of identity and affect of famous faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 11 (3), pp. 469-474.
Viewpoint: Perspectives on prosopagnosia and models of face recognition
Stone, A. and Valentine, Tim 2003. Viewpoint: Perspectives on prosopagnosia and models of face recognition. Cortex. 39 (1), pp. 31-40.