Security trumps drug control: How securitization explains drug policy paradoxes in Thailand and Vietnam
Windle, J. 2016. Security trumps drug control: How securitization explains drug policy paradoxes in Thailand and Vietnam. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. 23 (4), pp. 344-354.
This paper investigates the paradoxes inherent in Thai and Vietnamese drug policies. The two countries have much in common. Both are ultra-prohibitionist states which employ repressive policies to contain drug markets. Their policies have, however, diverged in two key areas: opium suppression and harm reduction. Thailand implemented an effective intervention to suppress opium farming centred upon alternative development, whereas Vietnam suppressed opium production through coercive negotiation with nominal alternative development. Vietnam has embraced elements of harm reduction, whereas Thailand has been slow to implement harm reduction policies. This paper hypothesises that these two differences are largely a product of their perceived relationship to security. The two cases demonstrate how once an issue is securitized the ultra-prohibitionist rules of the game can be broken to allow for more humane and pragmatic policies.
|Journal||Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy|
|Journal citation||23 (4), pp. 344-354|
|Publisher||Taylor & Francis|
|Accepted author manuscript|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||doi:10.3109/09687637.2016.1140720|
|25 Feb 2016|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||01 Mar 2016|
|Accepted||05 Jan 2016|
|Copyright information||This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy on 25.02.16, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.3109/09687637.2016.1140720|
4views this month
6downloads this month