Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law

Article

Marinova, M. 2024. Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine. 5, pp. 40-41.
AuthorsMarinova, M.
Abstract

The As-Efficient Competitor (AEC) test is a key aspect of European Union (EU) competition law. It was created to distinguish between conduct that is anti-competitive and conduct that is procompetitive. The AEC test has played a crucial role in defining the competitive landscape in the EU. However, recent judgments have raised questions about the future of the AEC test. Recently, the European Commission published a communication indicating amendments to its Article 102 TFEU Guidance Paper in light of the latest EU Courts’ judgments. This brief paper explores the challenges and implications facing the AEC test in EU competition law. By examining its development and current issues, we aim to provide insight into the ongoing debate about the AEC test and its impact on competition policy within the EU.

JournalThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine
Journal citation5, pp. 40-41
Year2024
PublisherThoughtLeaders4
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Web address (URL)https://thoughtleaders4.com/competition/competition-knowledge-hub-view/competition-issue-5-riding-the-rapids-q2s-competition-law-and-litigation-update
Publication dates
Online16 May 2024
Publication process dates
Deposited12 Jun 2024
Copyright holder© 2024, ThoughtLeaders4
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8xx49

Log in to edit

File access - Request a copy

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 186
    total views
  • 3
    total downloads
  • 20
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law?
Marinova, M. 2025. The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law? Competition Law Insight.
The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2025. The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law. Concurrences Review. p. In Press.
Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Evaluation of the CMA’s Report on AI Foundation Models and their impact on competition and consumer protection
Marinova, M. Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Evaluation of the CMA’s Report on AI Foundation Models and their impact on competition and consumer protection. Competition Law Insight.
From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation
Marinova, M. 2024. From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine.
The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework
Marinova, M. 2024. The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 15 (7), pp. 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae062
Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU. Competition Law Journal. 23 (1), p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2024.01.01
Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. p. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnae033
Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen
Marinova, M. 2024. Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen. European Competition Journal. 20 (2), pp. 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2023.2280329
Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK
Marinova, M. 2023. Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine. 3, pp. 58-59.
The role of the ‘as efficient competitor’ test after the CJEU judgement in Intel
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2018. The role of the ‘as efficient competitor’ test after the CJEU judgement in Intel. Competition Law & Policy Debate. 4 (2), pp. 64-72. https://doi.org/10.4337/clpd.2018.02.07
What Can We Learn About the Application of the as Efficient Competitor Test in Fidelity Rebate Cases from the Recent US Case Law?
Marinova, M. 2018. What Can We Learn About the Application of the as Efficient Competitor Test in Fidelity Rebate Cases from the Recent US Case Law? World Competition. 41 (4), p. 523–548. https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2018029
Exploitative Abuse of a Dominant Position in the Bulgarian Energy Markets
Marinova, M. and Yaneva-Ivanova, K. 2017. Exploitative Abuse of a Dominant Position in the Bulgarian Energy Markets. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies. 10 (16), pp. 33-56. https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.2
Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach?
Marinova, M. 2016. Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach? European Competition Journal. 12 (2-3), pp. 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2017.1289706