The European Commission’s Draft Article 102 Guidelines Under Fire: Examining the substance and the roots of the Criticism

Article


Marinova, M. 2025. The European Commission’s Draft Article 102 Guidelines Under Fire: Examining the substance and the roots of the Criticism. Competition Law Journal. p. In press.
AuthorsMarinova, M.
Abstract

Recently, the European Commission published Draft Guidelines on the application of Article 102 TFEU to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings, which provoked considerable criticism and raised concerns among commentators. The main concerns are raised about the shift away from the established effects-based approach, and in that context, particularly the downplaying of the As-Efficient Competitor (AEC) test; and the introduction of presumptions, which may diminish legal certainty by shifting the burden of proof onto companies. This paper provides a critical analysis of the Draft Guidelines, evaluating their consistency with the existing legal framework and case law. It focuses on addressing the concerns expressed publicly by various stakeholders, evaluating their validity, and determining whether they are fully sustainable. While some concerns may have merit, this paper argues that the criticisms are not entirely justified. The goal of the paper is to formulate recommendations that both reflect stakeholders’ concerns and remain practical and balanced in application.

JournalCompetition Law Journal
Journal citationp. In press
ISSN1476-9085
Year2025
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Web address (URL)https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/clj/clj-overview.xml
Publication process dates
Accepted04 Jun 2025
Deposited04 Jun 2025
Copyright holder© 2025 The Author
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8zq21

Restricted files

Accepted author manuscript

  • 5
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 5
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Collective Dominance Under Scrutiny: Closing the Enforcement Gap or Complicating EU Competition Policy?
Marinova, M. 2025. Collective Dominance Under Scrutiny: Closing the Enforcement Gap or Complicating EU Competition Policy? Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies. p. In press.
Company Law Obligations in the Context of Gun-Jumping in Merger Control
Marinova, M. 2025. Company Law Obligations in the Context of Gun-Jumping in Merger Control. in: Company Law LexisNexis. pp. In press
Competition Law in Limbo: Intel, Fidelity Rebates, and the Price of a Procedural Error
Marinova, M. 2025. Competition Law in Limbo: Intel, Fidelity Rebates, and the Price of a Procedural Error. European Competition Journal. p. In press. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2025.2499322
The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law?
Marinova, M. 2025. The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law? Competition Law Insight.
Intellectual Property and NFT Use in the Metaverse: A Global Approach to Regulation
Marinova, M. 2025. Intellectual Property and NFT Use in the Metaverse: A Global Approach to Regulation. in: Salami, I. and Islam, N. (ed.) Metaverse Innovation: Technological, Financial, and Legal Perspectives Springer Nature.
The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2025. The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law. Concurrences Review. p. In Press.
Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications
Marinova, M. 2025. Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. 13 (1), pp. 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnae033
Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Evaluation of the CMA’s Report on AI Foundation Models and their impact on competition and consumer protection
Marinova, M. Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Evaluation of the CMA’s Report on AI Foundation Models and their impact on competition and consumer protection. Competition Law Insight.
From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation
Marinova, M. 2024. From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine.
The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework
Marinova, M. 2024. The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 15 (7), pp. 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae062
Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU. Competition Law Journal. 23 (1), p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2024.01.01
Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law
Marinova, M. 2024. Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law. ThoughtLeaders4.
Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen
Marinova, M. 2024. Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen. European Competition Journal. 20 (2), pp. 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2023.2280329
Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK
Marinova, M. 2023. Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK. ThoughtLeaders4.
The role of the ‘as efficient competitor’ test after the CJEU judgement in Intel
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2018. The role of the ‘as efficient competitor’ test after the CJEU judgement in Intel. Competition Law & Policy Debate. 4 (2), pp. 64-72. https://doi.org/10.4337/clpd.2018.02.07
What Can We Learn About the Application of the as Efficient Competitor Test in Fidelity Rebate Cases from the Recent US Case Law?
Marinova, M. 2018. What Can We Learn About the Application of the as Efficient Competitor Test in Fidelity Rebate Cases from the Recent US Case Law? World Competition. 41 (4), p. 523–548. https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2018029
Exploitative Abuse of a Dominant Position in the Bulgarian Energy Markets
Marinova, M. and Yaneva-Ivanova, K. 2017. Exploitative Abuse of a Dominant Position in the Bulgarian Energy Markets. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies. 10 (16), pp. 33-56. https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.2
Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach?
Marinova, M. 2016. Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach? European Competition Journal. 12 (2-3), pp. 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2017.1289706