Unlocking Manufacturer Utopia: AI’s Role in Perfect Price Discrimination

Conference item


Bergqvist, C. and Marinova, M. 2025. Unlocking Manufacturer Utopia: AI’s Role in Perfect Price Discrimination. 2025 ASCOLA Conference. 25 - 28 Jun 2025
AuthorsBergqvist, C. and Marinova, M.
Abstract

The growing use of algorithms, including those powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) to optimize prices, has generated significant debate about their benefits and potential adverse effects on competition and consumers. Two key issues emerge in this debate: the use of algorithms that facilitate personalized pricing, based on individual consumer data - a practice that results in price discrimination, referred to as algorithmic price discrimination - and their potential to facilitate tacit collusion. While the algorithmic tacit collusion has received considerable attention in both academic and policy discussions, the potential harm arising from algorithmic price discrimination remains comparatively underexplored. This article examines whether the current competition law framework is adequate to tackle algorithmic price discrimination that harms consumers. It argues for robust competition law enforcement under Article 102(a) TFEU to ensure that algorithmic pricing does not become a tool for exploitative abuse in the digital economy. However, it also outlines how case law is underdeveloped and, in some aspect, hostile to submitting personalized pricing under Article 102(a) TFEU.

Year2025
Conference2025 ASCOLA Conference
File
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Publication process dates
Deposited18 Jun 2025
Web address (URL) of conference proceedingshttps://www.luc.edu/law/academics/centersinstitutesandprograms/instituteforconsumerantitruststudies/events/ascola2025/
Copyright holder© 2025 The Authors
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8zvx3

Download files


File
presentation slides ASCOLA 2025 final.pdf
License: All rights reserved
File access level: Anyone

  • 0
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

A Matter of Merits: the CAT overturns and remakes the CMA’s Phenytoin Decision, upholding infringements
Marinova, M. 2025. A Matter of Merits: the CAT overturns and remakes the CMA’s Phenytoin Decision, upholding infringements. CCP 2025 Annual Conference. London 09 - 10 Jun 2025
The European Commission’s Draft Article 102 Guidelines Under Fire: Examining the substance and the roots of the Criticism
Marinova, M. 2025. The European Commission’s Draft Article 102 Guidelines Under Fire: Examining the substance and the roots of the Criticism. Competition Law Journal. p. In press.
Collective Dominance Under Scrutiny: Closing the Enforcement Gap or Complicating EU Competition Policy?
Marinova, M. 2025. Collective Dominance Under Scrutiny: Closing the Enforcement Gap or Complicating EU Competition Policy? Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies. p. In press.
Company Law Obligations in the Context of Gun-Jumping in Merger Control
Marinova, M. 2025. Company Law Obligations in the Context of Gun-Jumping in Merger Control. in: Company Law LexisNexis. pp. In press
Competition Law in Limbo: Intel, Fidelity Rebates, and the Price of a Procedural Error
Marinova, M. 2025. Competition Law in Limbo: Intel, Fidelity Rebates, and the Price of a Procedural Error. European Competition Journal. p. In press. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2025.2499322
The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law?
Marinova, M. 2025. The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law? Competition Law Insight.
Intellectual Property and NFT Use in the Metaverse: A Global Approach to Regulation
Marinova, M. 2025. Intellectual Property and NFT Use in the Metaverse: A Global Approach to Regulation. in: Salami, I. and Islam, N. (ed.) Metaverse Innovation: Technological, Financial, and Legal Perspectives Springer Nature.
The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2025. The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law. Concurrences Review. p. In Press.
Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications
Marinova, M. 2025. Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. 13 (1), pp. 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnae033
Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Evaluation of the CMA’s Report on AI Foundation Models and their impact on competition and consumer protection
Marinova, M. Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Evaluation of the CMA’s Report on AI Foundation Models and their impact on competition and consumer protection. Competition Law Insight.
From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation
Marinova, M. 2024. From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine.
The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework
Marinova, M. 2024. The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 15 (7), pp. 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae062
Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU. Competition Law Journal. 23 (1), p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2024.01.01
Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law
Marinova, M. 2024. Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law. ThoughtLeaders4.
Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen
Marinova, M. 2024. Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen. European Competition Journal. 20 (2), pp. 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2023.2280329
Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK
Marinova, M. 2023. Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK. ThoughtLeaders4.
The role of the ‘as efficient competitor’ test after the CJEU judgement in Intel
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2018. The role of the ‘as efficient competitor’ test after the CJEU judgement in Intel. Competition Law & Policy Debate. 4 (2), pp. 64-72. https://doi.org/10.4337/clpd.2018.02.07
What Can We Learn About the Application of the as Efficient Competitor Test in Fidelity Rebate Cases from the Recent US Case Law?
Marinova, M. 2018. What Can We Learn About the Application of the as Efficient Competitor Test in Fidelity Rebate Cases from the Recent US Case Law? World Competition. 41 (4), p. 523–548. https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2018029
Exploitative Abuse of a Dominant Position in the Bulgarian Energy Markets
Marinova, M. and Yaneva-Ivanova, K. 2017. Exploitative Abuse of a Dominant Position in the Bulgarian Energy Markets. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies. 10 (16), pp. 33-56. https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.2
Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach?
Marinova, M. 2016. Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach? European Competition Journal. 12 (2-3), pp. 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2017.1289706