From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation

Corporate publication


Marinova, M. 2024. From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine.
AuthorsMarinova, M.
Abstract

The Digital Markets, Competition, and Consumer (DMCC) Bill, which received Royal Assent and was adopted on 24 May 2024, represents a landmark development in the United Kingdom’s regulatory framework. This bill brought the most significant changes to the UK’s competition and consumer protection laws since establishing the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). Central to this reform is the introduction of specific conduct rules for companies classified as having ‘Strategic Market Status’ (SMS). These companies are considered to have a significant impact on the functioning of the digital markets, which require their close monitoring to ensure fair competition and protection of consumer interests. The CMA has been granted the authority to enforce these rules, marking a shift towards a more proactive regulatory stance in digital markets. Implementing the DMCC Bill highlights the UK’s dedication to promoting a fair and competitive digital marketplace. It reflects a strategic approach that balances the need for innovation with regulatory oversight, emphasizing the importance of robust competition in delivering high-quality products, services, and value to consumers. As digital markets evolve, the CMA’s proactive and adaptive regulatory strategies will be essential in shaping an inclusive digital economy that benefits all stakeholders. This brief paper summarises the CMA’s approach to digital market regulation under the DMCC Bill and explores the main challenges it may face, considering the complexities of digital regulation.

KeywordsCMA; DMA; Regulation
Year2024
PublisherThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine
Web address (URL)https://thoughtleaders4.com/images/uploads/news/Competition_Issue_6_2.pdf?__hstc=251652889.45bf57359a2ae6249bace83848a0e8d2.1733210806470.1733210806470.1733210806470.1&__hssc=251652889.2.1733210806470&__hsfp=770498740
File
License
File Access Level
Repository staff only
Publication dates
OnlineSep 2024
Publication process dates
Accepted04 Aug 2024
Deposited03 Jan 2025
Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8yqw5

  • 14
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 14
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law?
Marinova, M. 2025. The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law? Competition Law Insight.
The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2025. The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law. Concurrences Review. p. In Press.
The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework
Marinova, M. 2024. The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 15 (7), pp. 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae062
Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU. Competition Law Journal. 23 (1), p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2024.01.01
Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law
Marinova, M. 2024. Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine. 5, pp. 40-41.
Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. p. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnae033
Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen
Marinova, M. 2024. Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen. European Competition Journal. 20 (2), pp. 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2023.2280329
Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK
Marinova, M. 2023. Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine. 3, pp. 58-59.
Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach?
Marinova, M. 2016. Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach? European Competition Journal. 12 (2-3), pp. 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2017.1289706