The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework

Article


Marinova, M. 2024. The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. p. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae062
AuthorsMarinova, M.
Abstract

The application of the principle of proportionality in competition law enforcement is of utmost importance. However, there are concerns regarding its effective implementation under the DMCC Bill, primarily due to the restricted extent of judicial review. The lack of a comprehensive evaluation of the merits in the DMCC Bill could impede the meticulous assessment of proportionality in CMA decisions, potentially resulting in the adoption of measures that are not commensurate with their goals. This raises concerns about the possibility of implementing disproportionate measures. There is a pressing requirement for the CMA to provide more comprehensive instructions on how to apply the proportionality principle, specifically in terms of incorporating efficiency considerations, to guarantee the efficient implementation of the principle.

JournalJournal of European Competition Law & Practice
Journal citationp. In Press
ISSN2041-7764
Year2024
PublisherOxford University Press
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Anyone
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae062
Publication dates
Online04 Oct 2024
Publication process dates
Accepted10 Sep 2024
Deposited13 Nov 2024
Copyright holder© 2024 The Authors
Additional information

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, following peer review. The version of record Miroslava Marinova, The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2024;, lpae062, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae062

Permalink -

https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8y793

Restricted files

Accepted author manuscript

  • 31
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 16
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU. Competition Law Journal. 23 (1), p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2024.01.01
Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law
Marinova, M. 2024. Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine. 5, pp. 40-41.
Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. p. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnae033
Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen
Marinova, M. 2024. Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen. European Competition Journal. 20 (2), pp. 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2023.2280329
Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK
Marinova, M. 2023. Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine. 3, pp. 58-59.
Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach?
Marinova, M. 2016. Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach? European Competition Journal. 12 (2-3), pp. 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2017.1289706