Dr Miroslava Marinova
| Name | Dr Miroslava Marinova |
|---|---|
| ORCID | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-2435 |
| Job title | Senior Lecturer |
| Email address | m.marinova@uel.ac.uk |
| Research institute | Business & Law |
Research outputs
Company Law Obligations in the Context of Gun-Jumping in Merger Control
Marinova, M. 2025. Company Law Obligations in the Context of Gun-Jumping in Merger Control. in: Company Law LexisNexis. pp. In pressCompetition Law in Limbo: Intel, Fidelity Rebates, and the Price of a Procedural Error
Marinova, M. 2025. Competition Law in Limbo: Intel, Fidelity Rebates, and the Price of a Procedural Error. European Competition Journal. p. In press.The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2025. The Battle for Search: United States v. Google LLC and Its Implications for Antitrust Law. Concurrences Review. p. In Press.The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law?
Marinova, M. 2025. The As-Efficient Competitor Test: A Cornerstone or a Controversy in EU Competition Law? Competition Law Insight.The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework
Marinova, M. 2024. The UK’s digital market regulation: the need for a proportionality principle in the CMA’s new framework. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 15 (7), pp. 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpae062Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU
Marinova, M. 2024. Rethinking the ‘as efficient competitor’ test: assessing the wider impact of the CJEU’s judgment in Unilever Italia and its implications in shaping the European Commission’s agenda to reform Article 102 TFEU. Competition Law Journal. 23 (1), p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2024.01.01From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation
Marinova, M. 2024. From Challenges to Solutions: The CMA's Approach to Digital Market Regulation. ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine.Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications
Marinova, M. 2025. Rethinking the legal test for excessive pricing: Insights from the Landmark UK CMA v Pfizer/Flynn Case and Its Legal Implications. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. 13 (1), pp. 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnae033Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Evaluation of the CMA’s Report on AI Foundation Models and their impact on competition and consumer protection
Marinova, M. Balancing Innovation and Regulation: Evaluation of the CMA’s Report on AI Foundation Models and their impact on competition and consumer protection. Competition Law Insight.Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law
Marinova, M. 2024. Navigating the Crossroads: The Future of Efficient Competitor Test in EU Competition Law. ThoughtLeaders4.Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK
Marinova, M. 2023. Evolution of the legal test on excessive pricing in the UK. ThoughtLeaders4.Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen
Marinova, M. 2024. Unmasking Excessive Pricing: Evolution of EU Law on Excessive Pricing from United Brands to Aspen. European Competition Journal. 20 (2), pp. 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2023.2280329What Can We Learn About the Application of the as Efficient Competitor Test in Fidelity Rebate Cases from the Recent US Case Law?
Marinova, M. 2018. What Can We Learn About the Application of the as Efficient Competitor Test in Fidelity Rebate Cases from the Recent US Case Law? World Competition. 41 (4), p. 523–548. https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2018029The role of the ‘as efficient competitor’ test after the CJEU judgement in Intel
Kuhn, K-U. and Marinova, M. 2018. The role of the ‘as efficient competitor’ test after the CJEU judgement in Intel. Competition Law & Policy Debate. 4 (2), pp. 64-72. https://doi.org/10.4337/clpd.2018.02.07Exploitative Abuse of a Dominant Position in the Bulgarian Energy Markets
Marinova, M. and Yaneva-Ivanova, K. 2017. Exploitative Abuse of a Dominant Position in the Bulgarian Energy Markets. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies. 10 (16), pp. 33-56. https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.2Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach?
Marinova, M. 2016. Should the rejection of the “as efficient competitor” test in the Intel and Post Danmark II judgements lead to dismissal of the effect-based approach? European Competition Journal. 12 (2-3), pp. 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2017.12897061187
total views of outputs183
total downloads of outputs254
views of outputs this month61
downloads of outputs this month